Assessment for Effective Intervention

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quenemoen, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quenemoen, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 26, No. 2, 67-74 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/073724770102600211
© 2001 Hammill Institute on Disabilities

Eight Steps to Effective Implementation of Alternate Assessments

Sandra J. Thompson

National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota

Rachel F. Quenemoen

National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota

Alternate assessments provide a way for students with even the most significant disabilities to be included in state and district assessment systems. Eight important steps are involved in successful state or districtwide implementation. This article describes each of the following steps: (a) inform stakeholders about the importance of alternate assessments in the context of school reform; (b) educate all students to the same high standards and expectations; (c) identify partners to support alternate assessment participants in their work toward high standards; (d) use a practical process to decide how students will participate in assessments; (e) develop standards-based IEPs and transition plans and integrate performance data with alternate assessments; (f) use a variety of assessment strategies to collect and compile alternate assessment data; (g) score alternate assessments, report results, and use the data for school improvement; and (h) evaluate alternate assessment implementation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
E. Towles-Reeves, B. Garrett, P. J. Burdette, and M. Burdge
Validation of Large-Scale Alternate Assessment Systems and Their Influence on Instruction --What Are the Consequences?
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2006; 31(3): 45 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
B. Garrett, E. Towles, H. Kleinert, and J. Kearns
Portfolios in Large-Scale Alternate Assessment Systems: Frameworks for Reliability
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2003; 28(2): 17 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
H. L. Kleinert, B. Garrett, E. Towles, M. Garrett, K. Nowak-Drabik, C. Waddell, and J. Farmer Kearns
Alternate Assessment Scores and Life Outcomes for Students with Significant Disabilities: Are They Related?
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2002; 28(1): 19 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
S. J. Thompson, M. L. Thurlow, A. Esler, and P. J. Whetstone
Addressing Standards and Assessments on the IEP
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2001; 26(2): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]