| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Spelling Assessment: Practice and PromiseWestern Carolina University Current spelling assessment practices, including formal and informal instruments plus promising procedures, were reviewed. First, six individually administered standardized tests that are presently available to special educators and diagnosticians were examined. Second, informal procedures were grouped into two categories: Inventories and criterion-referenced tests, and error analysis. Each informal procedure was analyzed in terms of specific advantages and disadvantages. Finally, two particularly promising procedures, miciodiagnostics and developmental spelling, were reviewed.
Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 8, No. 2,
107-117 (1983) |
|||