Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiban, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Deno, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Math and Reading Curriculum-Based Measurements to Predict State Mathematics Test Performance

Are Simple One-Minute Measures Technically Adequate?

Cynthia L. Jiban

University of Minnesota, jiban001{at}umn.edu

Stanley L. Deno

University of Minnesota

This study investigated the technical adequacy of 3 simple, 1-min curriculum-based measurements (CBM) for predicting third (n = 35) and fifth (n = 49) graders' performance on a state standards test of mathematics. Measures included 2 numeric CBMs: a traditional basic facts measure and a new "cloze" math facts measure, designed to require deeper understanding of fact families. A silent reading measure served as third predictor CBM. Results indicated that reliability and criterion validity of 1-min administrations were insufficient. When scores from 2 administrations were aggregated, moderate correlations were achieved. Results of aggression analysis showed that reading and cloze math measures each made significant unique contributions to explaining performance on the state math test and together explained 52% of variance at fifth grade and 27% at third grade.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 32, No. 2, 78-89 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/15345084070320020501
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
T. J. Christ, S. Scullin, A. Tolbize, and C. L. Jiban
Implications of Recent Research: Curriculum-Based Measurement of Math Computation
Assessment for Effective Intervention, September 1, 2008; 33(4): 198 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]