Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Batsche, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kovaleski, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Competing Views

A Dialogue on Response to Intervention

George M. Batsche

University of South Florida, batsche{at}tempest.coedu.usf.edu

Kenneth A. Kavale

Regent University

Joseph F. Kovaleski

Indiana University of Pennsylvania

The provision for allowing local education agencies to use an assessment of a student's response to intervention (RTI) in lieu of a consideration of an ability— achievement discrepancy has been a controversial aspect of the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. To address issues that have arisen about RTI, a series of questions was posed to two authors who have written about the topic—one from an advocacy perspective and the other from a critical point of view. Their responses were arranged in a dialogue format so that these divergent views could be fully considered.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 32, No. 1, 6-19 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/15345084060320010301
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
M. Burns
Editor's Note
Assessment for Effective Intervention, June 1, 2009; 34(3): 131 - 131.
[PDF]

Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
M. L. Yell and E. Drasgow
Assessment for Eligibility Under IDEIA and the 2006 Regulations
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 32(4): 202 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]