| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/15345084060320010401 Technical Adequacy for Response to Intervention PracticesUniversity of Cincinnati, david.barnett{at}uc.edu
Northern Kentucky Head Start
University of Cincinnati
Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center
Arlitt Center University of Cincinnati
Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center
Loyola University Response-to-intervention (RTI) technical adequacy standards should follow from model purpose, procedural specification, procedural adherence, outcome determination, and subsequent plans. Therefore, RTI raises atypical measurement questions for practice, and, for this reason, it may require hybridized technical adequacy methods. Due to RTI model complexities, and the possibility of many measures and variables used over time to examine functional discrepancies in performance, decision reliability and validity questions require significant attention. Key points of analysis and recommendations for RTI technical adequacy standards are addressed, and a case study is used to illustrate technical checks. We conclude with discussion of how RTI technical adequacy may be simplified.
|