Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brigham, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brigham, M. St. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders and Their Teachers in Test-Linked Systems of Accountability

Frederick J. Brigham

University of Virginia

Suzanne Tochterman

Colorado State University

Michele St. Peter Brigham

Albemarle County Schools Charlottesville , VA

This article discusses the potential benefits and detriments of high-stakes assessment, the characteristics of useful assessments for students with disabilities and the potential impact of high-stakes assessment on students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). We suggest that the benefits of high-stakes assessment (or, more appropriately, test-linked standards) are most likely to be found in schools that are already attaining acceptable results relative to the standards. In schools serving students who are less privileged, test-linked standards are more likely to be associated with detrimental effects. We suggest that these tests are unlikely to be useful to teachers of students with EBD because they differ dramatically from assessment procedures that have been validated for students with disabilities. Test-linked standards, we conclude, are unlikely to yield benefit to students with EBD and quite likely to expose them to increased risk by focusing educational practice only on a narrowly defined and poorly evaluated set of outcomes.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 26, No. 1, 19-27 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/073724770002600104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?