Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jerger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Phoneme Perception Task (PPT): A Measure of Phoneme Perception in Orally Read Sentences

Margaret Jerger, Ph.D.

The Lab School of Washington, Washington, D.C.

Analysis of scores on the Phoneme Perception Task (PPT), a new measure of perception of phonemes in sentences, revealed an overall 75% accuracy of classification of students' group membership (56 students who never received special education services in grades 2 through 5 (non LD group) and 40 students of corresponding age, attending a school for students with learning disabilities (LD group). Concurrent validity was determined using the SCAN: A Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders (r =.39) (Keith 1986) and the Test of Written Language-2 (TOWL-2) Spontaneous Writing Quotient (Hammill & Larsen, 1988) ( r =.48). Interjudge reliability (.97) indicated strong observer agreement. Internal consistency (alpha = .74) was considered to be reduced by specific items that need revision prior to further study.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 23, No. 3, 123-139 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/073724779802300301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?