Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Glen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Novelty, Age, and IQ: a Theoretical Look At Human Preference for Novelty

Ronald C. Eaves

Auburn University

Roderick Glen

Auburn University

The differences in preferences for novelty among school-aged children who varied in chronological age and IQ were investigated. The results indicated that children in the high-IQ group spent significantly more time responding to novel items than did children in the low-IQ group. Also, children in the high-IQ group devoted a significantly higher percentage of time responding to novel items, relative to total item-inspection time, than did children in the low-IQ group. A significant CA X IQ interaction was found, which indicated that older children with higher IQs exhibited a significantly higher mean percentage of novelty preference than any of the other three groups (i.e., low CA-high IQ, high CA-low IQ, and low CA-low IQ). Correlations between novelty scores and IQ were consistent with those found in the infancy literature. The findings are congruent with the theory that preference for novelty is a continuing phenomenon from infancy through childhood and beyond. We infer that the interest shown by human beings in unfamiliar elements of their environment is one of an unknown number of fundamental building blocks of successful adaptation. We further speculate that the preference-for-novelty phenomenon may offer the underpinnings of a parsimonious solution to the learning paradox.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1-20 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/073724779602200101
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?