Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eaves, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tate-Braxton, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Statistically Significant Differences Between Standard Scores on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised

Ronald C. Eaves

Ronald C. Eaves, Auburn University

Gloria D. Campbell-Whatley

Gloria D. Campbell-Whatley, Auburn University

Caroline Dunn

Caroline Dunn, Auburn University

AmySue Reilly

AmySue Reilly, Auburn University

Carbestha Tate-Braxton

Carbestha Tate-Braxton, Auburn University

Standard scores on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised may be used to diagnose strengths and weaknesses in reading achievement. However, decisions regarding discrepancies that are based on visual inspection are tenuous because apparent differences may be a function of the unreliability of the tests being compared. A table was produced to facilitate paired comparisons between Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised standard scores. Use of this table can assist in determining intra-individual strengths and weaknesses, and thus, contribute to instructional planning.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1-7 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/153450849502100102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?