Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glascoe, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Borowitz, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Improving the Sensitivity of the Language Sector of the Denver Developmental Screening Test

Frances P. Glascoe

Frances P. Glascoe is assistant professor of Pediatrics

Kathleen C. Borowitz

Kathleen C. Borowitz is speech and language pathologist, both, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville.

The DDST and a brief measure of expressive language development were given to 114 children between 24 and 74 months of age. As in a previous study, the DDST failed to identify the majority of children who failed the expressive language screening. Changing total DDST scoring and using more rigorous cutoff scores—the ages at which 50% and 75% of the sample population passed language items—failed to substantially improve the predictive accuracy of the DDST. Adding a very limited number of expressive language items identified most of the children with language difficulties. Use of such a measure together with the DDST is advocated. Recommendations for further research include cross-validation of these findings, revision of the DDST language sector, and subsequent assessment of the test's sensitivity to a variety of mild handicapping conditions.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 13, No. 2-4, 76-85 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/153450848801300403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?