Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment for Effective Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Profile Differences Between Successfully and Unsuccessfully Mainstreamed Violent and Assaultive Youth

Henrick Roth

Henrick Roth is associate professor of Medical Psychology, Duke University

Charles L. Nicholson

Charles L. Nicholson is professor of Education, North Carolina Central University.

The purpose of this research is to examine the statistical relationship between psychoeducational profiles of violent and assaultive youth and their success or failure in being mainstreamed into public schools. The research hypothesis was that specific variables contained in a student's psychoeducational profile may contribute significantly to differences between his being successfully or unsuccessfully mainstreamed. Uncorrelated t tests indicated that follow-up contacts with the public school system, numerical ratings on an ecological measure, Verbal IQs, one of the WISC—R subtests (Similarities), and the PIAT Reading Comprehension, Reading Recognition, and Spelling scores differentiated significantly between the two groups.

Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 13, No. 2-4, 130-138 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/153450848801300409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?